🤞

Jury Process & Evaluation Criteria

Pitching Process

Evaluation takes place in two rounds on Friday, September 25:

image
  1. Round 1: Expert Jury (All Teams)
    • When: 14:00 – 16:00 (Submission deadline: 12:00)
    • Setup: Pitches take place in a closed room across 3 parallel panels.
    • Pitch Time: 4 minutes total (1-min pitch + 3-min Q&A).
    • Submission: 🛬Submit to expert jury
    • Goal: Shortlist selected teams for the main stage (announced at 17:00).
  2. Round 2: Main Jury (Selected Teams)
    • When: 18:00 – 18:45 (Final submission deadline: 17:30)
    • Setup: Pitches take place live on the main stage.
    • Pitch Time: 3 minutes total (2-min pitch + 1-min Q&A).
    • Submission: Via email: jury@swiss-ai-weeks.ch
    • Goal: Team visibility, final winner selection, and prize distribution at the Award Ceremony (19:30).

*Please note the pitch timing

In the Expert Jury, you have 4 minutes (1 min pitch and 3 min Q&A)

In the Main Jury, you have 3 minutes (2 min pitch and 1 min Q&A)

Jury Rules

  • Eligibility: The jury only evaluates projects submitted on time by registered teams where all members have a valid ticket and ID.
  • Independence: The jury acts independently to select winners. Decisions are final and cannot be legally appealed.
  • Conflicts of Interest: Any juror with a bias or personal interest in an outcome must declare it immediately and recuse themselves from voting.
  • Moderator: The jury moderator holds the tie-breaking vote on all decisions.

Evaluation Criteria

Judging is qualitative. You do not need to provide formal quantitative proof.

Preferences

  • Clean, reproducible code is preferred.
  • Concepts and execution that leverage modern AI paradigms.
  • For challenge submissions, the challenges objectives should be addressed.

Criteria

These criteria only structure the jury's discussion. The jury as a group may choose winners at its own discretion.

  1. Technical Functionality & AI: Does the solution work? Is the implementation technically sound and reproducible?
  2. User Experience: Is the solution intuitive, useful, and easy to use?
  3. Agentic Depth: Do autonomous agents handle complex logic?
  4. Originality & Fun Factor: Is the solution novel, surprising, or creatively engaging?
  5. Potential & Market Impact: Does it address a relevant problem? Can it grow beyond the hackathon? If applicable, does it meet the challenge objectives?